Part two is a great exploration in the concept of "counterfeit paintings" in the west and "临摹” in Chinese culture! It's a beautiful painting, and now, you've shared it with the world! Thank you Andrew. 😊
This is a fascinating article where by a "fake" painting developed new depth by the addition of comments from the artist whom the fake as emulating. As you say, its a tradition to riff of other's works, in painting or poetry, by saying "in the tradition of" - this one didn't do that. The Daoist philosophy at the end adds another layer to this. thank you for this very thoughtful post. :)
Part two is a great exploration in the concept of "counterfeit paintings" in the west and "临摹” in Chinese culture! It's a beautiful painting, and now, you've shared it with the world! Thank you Andrew. 😊
Hi Todd. I have learned a lot in this conversation. And like Hugh Moss and his "Li Keran," mine might just be all the more special as a result!
Such an interesting discussion of “fake” art, how this Chinese philosophical prospective is in contrast with Western materialistic attitudes . . .
Hi Hal. Yes, looking more broadly at art than simply art as object.
Part 2 is a delightful fascinating read at day’s end. Thx
This is a fascinating article where by a "fake" painting developed new depth by the addition of comments from the artist whom the fake as emulating. As you say, its a tradition to riff of other's works, in painting or poetry, by saying "in the tradition of" - this one didn't do that. The Daoist philosophy at the end adds another layer to this. thank you for this very thoughtful post. :)